Comments on: Ouuuuch http://shrinkmamma.com/2007/04/02/ouuuuch/ Making simple people feel complex since 2001 Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:21:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 by: Luka http://shrinkmamma.com/2007/04/02/ouuuuch/#comment-7686 Wed, 16 May 2007 02:37:39 +0000 http://shrinkmamma.com/2007/04/02/ouuuuch/#comment-7686 Happy Birthday! :-) Happy Birthday! :-)

]]> by: Csiki Andy http://shrinkmamma.com/2007/04/02/ouuuuch/#comment-7674 Mon, 14 May 2007 07:33:54 +0000 http://shrinkmamma.com/2007/04/02/ouuuuch/#comment-7674 By the way, since I got namechecked here, Ada, where are you? Are you in town? For how much longer? Do you have my number? By the way, since I got namechecked here, Ada, where are you? Are you in town? For how much longer? Do you have my number?

]]> by: Romer!can http://shrinkmamma.com/2007/04/02/ouuuuch/#comment-7579 Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:20:35 +0000 http://shrinkmamma.com/2007/04/02/ouuuuch/#comment-7579 While I'm yakking, I start to remember more. It seems I had the trouble but it was nearly exclusively confined to our favorite Cziksereda brit. So, I had to rescue a handful of posts by manually checking the spam list before deleting them. Again, these days, it appears done with the learning process because I almost never have any non-spam get caught in the trap. I'd rate it as 99.999% accuracy, although I'll admit to still manually reviewing the spamtrap before purging it. While I’m yakking, I start to remember more. It seems I had the trouble but it was nearly exclusively confined to our favorite Cziksereda brit. So, I had to rescue a handful of posts by manually checking the spam list before deleting them.

Again, these days, it appears done with the learning process because I almost never have any non-spam get caught in the trap. I’d rate it as 99.999% accuracy, although I’ll admit to still manually reviewing the spamtrap before purging it.

]]> by: Romer!can http://shrinkmamma.com/2007/04/02/ouuuuch/#comment-7578 Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:18:05 +0000 http://shrinkmamma.com/2007/04/02/ouuuuch/#comment-7578 Is it fixed now? It learns as it goes, so I had lost one or two comments in the first six months, but that's not a bad ratio. After that, I've not had any other problems for the subsequent year. I've never tried this, but it seems reasonable to me that perhaps Robi could poke into the database and extract those comments (I'm assuming the rows are flagged instead of deleted). It's one idea, anyway. Is it fixed now? It learns as it goes, so I had lost one or two comments in the first six months, but that’s not a bad ratio. After that, I’ve not had any other problems for the subsequent year.

I’ve never tried this, but it seems reasonable to me that perhaps Robi could poke into the database and extract those comments (I’m assuming the rows are flagged instead of deleted). It’s one idea, anyway.

]]>